Back to News
Earnings AnalysisCVNA

CVNA Q4 2025: Revenue +58% as 8-Lens Analysis Flags Elevated Risk

Matt RuncheySHORELINE, WA — February 18, 2026 · 8:30 PM PST5 min

Disclosure: As of 2026-02-10, the Runchey Research Model Trading Fund holds put options in CVNA. Per our Editorial Policy, these are classified as Event-Driven holdings and may be adjusted immediately following the relevant catalyst event. View our full Editorial Integrity & Disclosure Policy.

Carvana reported Q4 revenue of $5.6B (+58% YoY) on 163,522 retail units (+43%), capping a full year of $20.3B in revenue (+49%). Today we also publish a complete 8-lens committee analysis — the most comprehensive framework we have applied to any equity — replacing the prior 2-lens assessment. Across 13 signals and 8 independent analytical lenses, the committee finds genuine operational strength housed within a governance structure that two lenses independently classify between CAPTURED and MISALIGNED.

The Numbers

$20.3B
FY2025 Revenue
+49% YoY
$2.2B
Adj. EBITDA
1.3x net debt / EBITDA
$1.9B
GAAP Net Income
Driven by $2.8B DTA release
$590M
Annual RPTs
Garcia family entities

The headline GAAP net income of $1.9B requires context: it was driven by a $2,785M non-cash deferred tax asset release on a pre-tax loss of ($890M). Adjusted EBITDA of $2,187M reflects genuine operational improvement. Management retired $709M in corporate notes, ended the year with $2.3B cash, and explicitly targets “investment-grade quality credit ratios.”

Q4 EBITDA margin dipped to 9.1% (from 10.1% YoY) due to reconditioning cost headwinds. Management guided 3-6 month resolution. Loan purchase partnerships expanded from 3 to 5 partners with $18B total capacity, though the Ally facility ($6B) expires October 2026.

8-Lens Committee: 13 Signals Assessed

This is the first equity to receive our full 8-lens treatment with the Black Swan Beacon tail risk overlay. Each lens conducted independent persona-based discourse (analyst debate, adversarial critique, convergence) before signals were aggregated. Read the full deep dive for the detailed findings.

Accounting IntegrityCONCERNINGFugazi Filter
Governance AlignmentCAPTURED / MISALIGNED2 Lenses
Regulatory ExposureELEVATED2 Lenses
Revenue DurabilityCONDITIONAL2 Lenses
Competitive PositionDEFENSIBLEMoat Mapper
Capital DeploymentDISCIPLINEDStress Scanner
The Central Tension
All 7 primary lenses identified the Garcia family related-party transaction complex as a material consideration — the highest cross-lens reinforcement we have recorded. Yet 4 lenses simultaneously validated that operational execution is genuine and improving. A company may build a strong business while having governance structures that extract disproportionate value. The unresolved question: if the SEC investigation resolves cleanly, does the governance structure remain a material impediment, or does operational momentum render it a tolerable structural feature?

The Garcia RPT Complex

The scale of related-party transactions became clearer with FY2025 disclosures. Total annual RPTs with Garcia-controlled entities now exceed $590M (MDA $338M +75% YoY, reconditioning $147M, leases $66M, wholesale $39M). The Tax Receivable Agreement liability surged from $65M to $2,228M ($1,721M to related parties) due to LLC unit conversions. Grant Thornton serves as auditor for Carvana, DriveTime, and GoFi — a shared auditor arrangement that two lenses flagged as a structural concern.

On the Q4 call, CEO Garcia III characterized short seller allegations as “100% inaccurate” — a blanket denial without point-by-point rebuttal that three lenses flagged as a management communication gap during an active SEC investigation.

Prediction Markets: 2 Resolved, 8 Active

Two prediction markets resolved with today's earnings. The ensemble correctly predicted that “Other” GPU would stay above $420 (52% probability, Brier 0.23) and that OCF/NI conversion would not fall below 50% (18% probability, Brier 0.03 — excellent). Five existing markets were updated and three new markets were added to maintain coverage across all signal categories.

Net debt/EBITDA at or below 2.0x (Q1 2026)86% → 92%0.97
Repo collateral cushion above 15% (Q1 2026)86% → 89%0.98
Q1 2026 unit growth at least 25% YoY80%0.84
Litigation ruling or trial date by Sep 202658% → 65%0.67
SEC investigation public escalation by Dec 202635%0.84
ABS spreads widen 100bps+ vs prime16% → 12%0.96

The largest shift was in the litigation market (+7pp to 65%), reflecting the case surviving both the original motion to dismiss and a subsequent motion for reconsideration — a higher bar than the initial analysis assumed. The ABS spread market moved lower (-4pp to 12%) after loan purchase partnerships expanded from 3 to 5, suggesting growing investor appetite for Carvana paper. View all 8 active CVNA forecast markets with updated predictions.

Tail Risk Assessment

The Black Swan Beacon — our tail risk and consensus bias lens — classified ASSUMPTION_FRAGILITY as FRAGILE, TAIL_RISK_SEVERITY as SEVERE, and CONSENSUS_BLINDSPOT as SIGNIFICANT_GAPS. The committee noted that all 7 primary lens assessments depend on financial statement accuracy supported by a single auditor alleged to operate across both sides of the RPT structure. The SEC cascade scenario (3-10% probability) produces 70-90% equity destruction. Restructuring tools used in 2022 (PIK conversion, debt exchange) have been permanently consumed, leaving fewer financial engineering escape routes in a downside scenario.

What Could Change Everything
The SEC investigation outcome is cited by 6 of 8 lenses as the single most likely catalyst to resolve the operational-vs.-governance tension. A clean resolution would likely de-escalate REGULATORY_EXPOSURE, ACCOUNTING_INTEGRITY, NARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP, and potentially GOVERNANCE_ALIGNMENT and FUNDING_FRAGILITY. A Wells Notice or enforcement action would escalate most classifications. Our ensemble assigns 35% probability to public escalation by December 2026.

Full 8-lens analysis with 13 signals, persona-based discourse, tail risk scenarios, and monitoring triggers

This report was generated by the Runchey Research AI Ensemble using primary SEC data and reviewed by Matthew Runchey for accuracy.

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. See our Editorial Integrity & Disclosure Policy and Terms of Service.