Back to Equities

LLY

Eli Lilly and Company
Healthcare · Pharmaceuticals
Gravy Gauge
Is this revenue durable?
Regulatory Reader
What do regulators see?
Moat Mapper
Is the advantage durable?
3
Lenses Applied
5
Signals Analyzed
3
Debates Resolved
8
Forecast Markets

Disclosure: As of 2026-02-10, the Runchey Research Model Trading Fund holds a long position in LLY. View our full Editorial Integrity & Disclosure Policy.

Material Update2026-02-04

Q4 2025 EARNINGS: Beat-and-Raise Confirms Thesis

Eli Lilly delivered $19.3B Q4 revenue (+43% YoY), beating consensus by $1.3B. 2026 guidance of $80-83B exceeded expectations. Tirzepatide concentration at 56% (within prior estimate). All signals CONFIRMED — no changes to CONDITIONAL revenue durability, ELEVATED regulatory exposure, or DEFENSIBLE competitive position. Stock +7% vs NVO -13%.

Read the full analysis
The Central Question
"Can Eli Lilly sustain 60% market share and +23-27% growth as the GLP-1 market matures and regulatory pressures persist through Q2 2026?"

Eli Lilly delivered a beat-and-raise Q4 2025 (Feb 4, 2026): $19.3B revenue (+43% YoY), $80-83B 2026 guidance (+23-27%), and stock up 7% vs Novo -13%. Tirzepatide concentration at 56% of revenue — the highest single-molecule concentration among large-cap pharma. Clinical superiority is verified (47% greater weight loss vs Wegovy) and competitive divergence vs Novo has widened dramatically. We applied three analytical lenses: all signals CONFIRMED with no changes warranted.

Executive Summary

Cross-lens roll-up assessment

Eli Lilly holds the strongest competitive position in the GLP-1 market with verified clinical superiority, manufacturing scale advantage, and 60% U.S. market share. However, unprecedented single-molecule concentration (57-63% of revenue on tirzepatide) creates binary exposure to regulatory and litigation outcomes. The investment thesis is CONDITIONAL — strong fundamentals dependent on navigating Q1-Q2 2026's convergence of four regulatory pressures without compound adverse events.

Proceed with CautionHIGH confidence

Eli Lilly's competitive position is strong and fundamentals remain robust (83.6% gross margin, 5 consecutive quarters of share gains). However, the convergence of regulatory pressures in Q1-Q2 2026 requires careful monitoring. Not a company in crisis, but the narrow window for multiple adverse events warrants measured positioning until key catalysts resolve.

Key Takeaways

  • REVENUE_DURABILITY rated CONDITIONAL: Tirzepatide's clinical superiority (47% greater weight loss) and manufacturing advantage are real, but 57-63% revenue concentration on a single molecule creates binary risk exposure
  • REGULATORY_EXPOSURE rated ELEVATED: Four concurrent pressures (MDL 3094, orforglipron FDA decision, IRA pricing precedent, Texas AG lawsuit) affect 55% of 2026E revenue; 62% probability of at least one adverse development in Q1-Q2 2026
  • COMPETITIVE_POSITION rated DEFENSIBLE: Market leadership established (60% share, 5 consecutive quarters of gains), but weak switching costs cap moat ceiling — current strength is high confidence, durability is constrained
  • Manufacturing provides temporal advantage: $50B+ investment creates 2-4 year capacity lead vs Novo, but is ultimately replicable; not a permanent moat

Key Tensions

  • Clinical superiority is verified but time-limited — competitive advantage erodes as competitors develop next-gen compounds
  • MDL 3094 financial exposure (~$1.5B, 0.2% market cap) is manageable, but label change risk is more material than settlement cost
  • Individual regulatory risks are manageable; compound timing risk (2+ adverse events simultaneously) is the tail scenario
  • Initial DOMINANT consensus revised to DEFENSIBLE after critique identified weak switching costs as structural constraint

Gravy Gauge

Is revenue durable or fragile?

About this lens

Key Metrics

Revenue Durability
CONDITIONAL
DURABLE
CONDITIONAL
FRAGILE
ARTIFICIAL
Regulatory Exposure
ELEVATED
MINIMAL
MANAGEABLE
ELEVATED
EXISTENTIAL

Key FindingsClick to expand details

Signal AssessmentsClick for full context

SignalAssessment
Revenue Durability
CONDITIONAL
Regulatory Exposure
ELEVATED

Model Debates

Cross-Lens Insights

Where Lenses Agree

  • Revenue Concentration is the Central Risk
  • Clinical Superiority is Verified but Time-Limited
  • Manufacturing Advantage is Temporal, Not Structural

The following publicly available documents were collected and extracted into a structured fact dossier that powered this analysis.

SEC Filing
  • Annual Report (10-K) — FY2024
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q) — Q3 2025
  • Current Report (8-K) — Nov 2025
Earnings Transcript
  • Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Research Document
  • Mounjaro Litigation Summary
  • Competitive Analysis (vs Novo Nordisk)