Situations

2026 U.S. Senate

Control of the U.S. Senate is decided November 3, 2026. Democrats hold 47 seats and need 51. For each seat that matters, this page sets the prediction-market price beside the published statistical models and the polling average. These should tell the same story. Where they do not, the gap is recorded, explained as far as the evidence allows, and scored after the election.

As of Oct 26, 2026

The sources put Democratic control anywhere from 54% to 72%.

  • Widest seat gap: Kansas, 26 points. DDHQ has the Democrat at 23%, 50+1 at 49%.
  • Kalshi prices Nebraska 3.2 points weaker for the Democrat than the polls. How far to mark down a poll lead is most of what the sources disagree about.
64%
Democratic control, market
54% to 72%
Democratic control, models
51.1
Expected Democratic seats, 51 needed
–
Days to election

How this page is kept

The numbers refresh on their own each morning. The explanations in the ledger are written by a separate analysis run, twice a week and whenever the numbers move, and are checked by a program before they publish. Each reading carries its own date, so a source that failed to update shows as old instead of silently standing in.

Daily data refreshAutomated
Every day, 7:30 a.m. Pacific

Market prices, both published models, poll averages, news feeds and FEC filings are pulled, the board and checks are recomputed, and the result is published. No judgment is involved; if a source fails, the last good reading stays and its date shows.

KalshiPolymarketDecision Desk HQFiftyPlusOneWikipedia poll tablesFECNews feeds
AnalysisAutomated
Mondays and Thursdays, and any day the numbers move

An AI model reads the new board against the last one it analysed, revises the ledger entries, opens new ones for gaps that have appeared, and logs what changed. Every lean must cite evidence and pass an automated check before it publishes. It publishes without a person reading it first; corrections are made in the open, in the log.

The boardEvidence tablesNews and FEC inbox
ScoringBy hand
After results are certified

Each ledger entry is scored on which side of the disagreement ended closer to the result. Maine, Alaska and Georgia may resolve late.

Latest readings: market prices Oct 26, 2026 · DDHQ Oct 2, 2026 · 50+1 Oct 26, 2026 · poll averages Oct 26, 2026

Where the sources disagree

The widest gaps are Kansas (26 points), Ohio (17 points) and Maine (16 points). The market sits at least 3 points outside every model on 8 seats: above on Alaska, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio and Texas; below on Florida, Iowa and South Carolina.

Each row is one race. A marker is one source's probability that the Democratic side wins, and the grey band runs from the lowest source to the highest. A short band means the sources agree; a long one is a disagreement worth explaining. Hover a row for the numbers, or open the table.

KalshiPolymarketDDHQ50+1
0%25%50%75%100%
Spread
Control
U.S. Senate control
Democrats win control
18 pts
Focus seatsthe seats that decide the majority
Ohio Senate (special)
Jon Husted (R)
17 pts
Maine Senate
Susan Collins (R)
16 pts
Alaska Senate
Dan Sullivan (R)
15 pts
Iowa Senate
Open seat
11 pts
Texas Senate
Open seat
9 pts
6 pts
Watchlong shots where the sources disagree
Kansas Senate
Roger Marshall (R)
26 pts
South Carolina Senate
Darline Graham (R)
10 pts
Nebraska Senate
Pete Ricketts (R)
9 pts
Settledcounted in the seat math, not in doubt
15 pts
Florida Senate (special)
Ashley Moody (R)
12 pts
10 pts
Georgia Senate
Jon Ossoff (D)
10 pts
2 pts
Table view
RaceKalshiPolymarketDDHQ50+1Spread
U.S. Senate control64%65%54%72%18 pts
Ohio Senate (special)68%—51%63%17 pts
Maine Senate60%—53%69%16 pts
Alaska Senate75%—60%66%15 pts
Iowa Senate42%—52%51%11 pts
Texas Senate65%—56%59%9 pts
Michigan Senate66%—71%67%6 pts
Kansas Senate40%—23%49%26 pts
South Carolina Senate24%—28%34%10 pts
Nebraska Senate27%—18%23%9 pts
North Carolina Senate97%—82%92%15 pts
Florida Senate (special)13%—23%24%12 pts
New Hampshire Senate90%—82%92%10 pts
Georgia Senate95%—87%97%10 pts
Minnesota Senate85%—86%84%2 pts

Sources: Kalshi · Polymarket · Decision Desk HQ · FiftyPlusOne. Model probabilities are each publisher's own; only the headline numbers are shown here.

What each source does to the polls

Kalshi marks the Democratic poll lead down most in Nebraska (3.2 points), Kansas (2.5 points) and South Carolina (2.5 points). It prices Minnesota 3.3 points stronger than its polls.

Every source reads the same polls and then adjusts them. Here each probability is turned back into the margin it implies and set against the polling average. A red bar means the source treats the Democrat as weaker than the polls show, a blue bar stronger. Sources that agree on the polls but not on the adjustment are disagreeing about how wrong the polls may be. The conversion assumes one error size for every race (6.5 points), so read it as a comparison between sources, not a measurement.

Priced weaker for the Democrat than the polls (points)Priced stronger than the polls
Nebraska4 poll averages
Polls say R +0.9
Kalshi
−3.2
DDHQ
−5.0
50+1
−3.9
Kansas5 poll averages
Polls say D +0.8
Kalshi
−2.5
DDHQ
−5.6
50+1
−1.0
South Carolina5 poll averages
Polls say R +2.1
Kalshi
−2.5
DDHQ
−1.7
50+1
−0.5
Iowa5 poll averages
Polls say R +0.1
Kalshi
−1.3
DDHQ
+0.4
50+1
+0.3
Ohio (special)5 poll averages
Polls say D +3.8
Kalshi
−0.9
DDHQ
−3.6
50+1
−1.7
Maine5 poll averages
Polls say D +2.0
Kalshi
−0.4
DDHQ
−1.5
50+1
+1.2
Michigan5 poll averages
Polls say D +2.8
Kalshi
−0.2
DDHQ
+0.8
50+1
0.0
Texas6 poll averages
Polls say D +2.3
Kalshi
+0.1
DDHQ
−1.3
50+1
−0.9
Alaska4 poll averages
Polls say D +2.6
Kalshi
+1.7
DDHQ
−1.0
50+1
+0.1
Settled seats (5)
Florida (special)5 poll averages
Polls say R +6.4
Kalshi
−1.1
DDHQ
+1.6
50+1
+1.9
New Hampshire5 poll averages
Polls say D +7.0
Kalshi
+1.1
DDHQ
−1.1
50+1
+2.0
North Carolina5 poll averages
Polls say D +10.8
Kalshi
+1.1
DDHQ
−4.9
50+1
−1.6
Georgia5 poll averages
Polls say D +8.5
Kalshi
+2.0
DDHQ
−1.2
50+1
+3.5
Minnesota5 poll averages
Polls say D +3.3
Kalshi
+3.3
DDHQ
+3.7
50+1
+3.1

Arithmetic checks

All 6 checks are consistent.

Some numbers have to agree by construction: a source's control probability with its own seat probabilities, a contract on several seats with the contracts on each, one question quoted on two venues. The bar is the range the other quotes imply and the tick is the number actually quoted. A tick outside the bar is a gap no opinion about the election can explain.

Consistent
Kalshi seat numbers against its control number
55.5%68.5%
Quoted 63.5% · implied 60.5% to 61.7% · off by 1.8, inside quoting noise
Consistent
Kalshi seat-count market against its control price
58.5%69.8%
Quoted 63.5% · implied 64.8% · off by 1.3, inside quoting noise
Consistent
Kalshi against Polymarket on the same question
58.5%69.5%
Quoted 63.5% · implied 64.5% · off by 1.0, inside quoting noise
Consistent
DDHQ seat numbers against its control number
46.5%59.2%
Quoted 54.0% · implied 51.5% to 54.1%
Consistent
50+1 seat numbers against its control number
53.7%81.3%
Quoted 72.4% · implied 61.2% to 73.8%
Consistent
Kalshi joint contract against its own seats
23.8%67.1%
Quoted 53.5% · implied 35.6% to 55.3% · implies seat correlation 0.84

Majority math

Democrats start from 43 seats and need 51, so they must win 8 of the 13 seats below.

Pick a source to load its seat probabilities, then drag any seat to see what it does to the chance of a majority. The second slider sets how much the seats move together: it leaves every single seat's odds alone and changes only how wide the range of totals is. The markers under each slider show where the sources put that seat. Reset returns to the market's numbers.

Start from
Chance of a Democratic majority
61%
Expected seats 51.1, against 51 needed. Kalshi quotes 64% for control directly.
0.84
independentall together
Democratic seats in the next Senate
12%
4344454647484950515253545556
Democratic majority (51 or more)Republican control (50 or fewer)
Focus seats
Alaska75%
Ohio (special)68%
Michigan66%
Texas65%
Maine60%
Iowa42%
Watch
Kansas40%
South Carolina24%
Settled
North Carolina97%
Georgia95%
New Hampshire90%
Minnesota85%
Florida (special)13%

34 Democratic-caucus seats are not up and 9 more (CO, DE, IL, MA, NJ, NM, OR, RI, VA) are rated safe by every tracked source. Seats outside the roster that every source prices under 12% Democratic (MT, LA, MS, ID and the safe Republican states) are treated as Republican holds.

Ledger

6 disagreements are on the record.

An entry is opened when a gap has been examined. It states why the numbers should match, what the evidence says about why they do not, and, where the evidence supports it, which side looks closer. After the election each entry is scored against the result.

1
points apart

Kalshi and Polymarket are 4 points apart on Senate control

Unclassified

Kalshi is at 63.5% and Polymarket at 64.5% on the same question, a 1-point gap, from 4 on October 25: Kalshi rose a point and Polymarket fell 2. The gap is under the 2-point tolerance on one board; the entry closes if it stays there on the next. Kalshi has been at or below Polymarket on all 25 boards. The evidence does not favor either venue's number.

Kalshi 64%Polymarket 65%
Why these should match, and what could explain the gap

Both contracts pay on which party controls the Senate after the November 3 election, and the two settlement rules give the same answer in every seat outcome except a chamber organized by an independent's vote, so a lasting gap is either a difference in what the contracts pay on or a cost of holding both. After the October 11 entry closed, the gap ran from 0 to 2 points on every board from October 12 to 24, with Kalshi lower on all but October 23, when both were at 67.5%. On October 25 Kalshi fell from 65.5% to 62.5% and Polymarket from 67.5% to 66.5%, a 4-point gap. Today Kalshi rose to 63.5% and Polymarket fell to 64.5%. Kalshi's seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, went from 66.4% to 64.8% over the same day; on both days it ended within half a point of Polymarket's price.

  • Settlement wording: Kalshi settles on the party of the President pro tempore on February 1, 2027; Polymarket on a party holding more than half the voting seats, or half plus the Vice Presidency, falling back to the Majority Leader's party if that is ambiguous and to "Other" if the leader caucuses with neither party. The rules part only in a chamber organized by an independent's vote.
  • Quoting: the board takes Kalshi's figure as the midpoint of a 63-64 quote and Polymarket's as the outcome price its public API publishes, with no bid or ask recorded, so part of the gap may sit inside Polymarket's quote.
  • Flow on one contract: the October 25 widening came from Kalshi's control contract, which fell 3 points while Kalshi's seat-count market rose and the probability its thirteen seat contracts imply fell under a point; today's narrowing came mostly from Polymarket's 2-point fall. The move may sit with each contract's traders rather than with news.
Opened Oct 25, 2026 · U.S. Senate control
2
points apart

Kalshi and Polymarket are 3 points apart on Senate control

Unclassified

Closed October 15: Kalshi is at 61.5% and Polymarket at 63.5% on the same question, a 2-point gap on each of the four boards since October 12, from 3 on October 11, inside the 2-point tolerance. Kalshi rose a point and Polymarket held. Kalshi has been at or below Polymarket on all fourteen boards since October 2.

Kalshi 62%Polymarket 64%
Why these should match, and what could explain the gap

Both contracts pay on which party controls the Senate after the November 3 election, and in almost every seat outcome the two settlement rules give the same answer, so a lasting gap is either a difference in what the contracts pay on or a cost of holding both. The gap ran from 0 to 2 points on the boards from October 2 to 10, with Kalshi lower on seven and level on two, and reached 3 today as Polymarket rose from 62.5% on October 9 to 63.5% while Kalshi held at 60.5% for a third board.

  • Settlement wording: Kalshi settles on the party of the President pro tempore on February 1, 2027; Polymarket on a party holding more than half the voting seats, or half plus the Vice Presidency, falling back to the Majority Leader’s party if that is ambiguous and to “Other” if the leader caucuses with neither party. The rules part only in a chamber organized by an independent’s vote.
  • Quoting: the board takes Kalshi’s figure as the midpoint of a 60-61 quote and Polymarket’s as the outcome price its public API publishes, with no bid or ask recorded, so part of the gap may sit inside Polymarket’s quote.
  • A standing offset: Kalshi has been at or below Polymarket on all ten boards, through a 4-point fall in Kalshi’s price since October 5, so the difference may lie in who trades each venue rather than in news; today’s widening came with no move on Kalshi.
Opened Oct 11, 2026 · U.S. Senate control
18
points apart

Two models reading the same polls are 20 points apart on control

Unclassified

DDHQ says 54%, FiftyPlusOne 72.4%. Each matches what its own seat numbers imply, so the gap is in the seats: FiftyPlusOne is higher in ten of fourteen by 2 points or more, most of all in Kansas (25.7 points apart across sources), Ohio (16.5) and Maine (15.8). DDHQ's number is dated October 2, the last its page gave the reader; Silver Bulletin, read once on October 4, said 72.8%.

DDHQ 54%Kalshi 64%Polymarket 65%50+1 72%
Why these should match, and what could explain the gap

Both models take the same public polling and the same seat map, and each one's control number sits inside the range its own seat probabilities imply. So the gap is not about how seats combine; it is the sum of seat-level differences. Kansas is widest: FiftyPlusOne's number fell from 51.2% to 48.7% in its October 26 reading, against DDHQ's 23% and Kalshi's 39.5%, both unchanged since October 24. Against the five-aggregator poll average of Hamilton +0.8, FiftyPlusOne takes 1.0 point off his lead, Kalshi 2.5 and DDHQ 5.6. In Ohio the poll average is Brown +3.8; DDHQ's model takes 3.6 points off his lead, FiftyPlusOne, down from 64.5% to 62.7%, takes off 1.7, and Kalshi, unchanged at 67.5%, takes off 0.9. In Maine, where the poll average is Jackson +2.0, DDHQ takes 1.5 points off his lead and FiftyPlusOne adds 1.2; Kalshi fell from 60.5% to 59.5% and takes 0.4 off. Expected Democratic seats are 50.5 for DDHQ and 51.5 for FiftyPlusOne, either side of the majority line. Kalshi (63.5%, up 1 point since October 25) and Polymarket (64.5%, down 2) are still between the two models. FiftyPlusOne's control number fell from 73.5% to 72.4% in the same reading, which narrowed the spread from 19.5 points to 18.4.

  • Maine is where structure and polling point opposite ways: incumbents in Collins's position have lost 8 of 9 midterm races since 2006, but her 2020 result beat the final polling average by 12 points.
  • Ohio and Kansas turn on how far to mark down a Democratic poll lead in a state Trump carried. The record runs from 2 to 3 points in the contested midterm races of 2018 and 2022 to 5.3 across all Republican-state midterm races since 2014. Brown adds a wrinkle: in 2024 he ran 7.6 points ahead of the top of the ticket and still lost by 3.6.
  • Timing: DDHQ's reading is dated October 2. Its page showed no newer one when read on October 3 and 4, and the daily reader has recorded no newer reading on any day from October 5 to 26, so a newer DDHQ number, if one exists, is not on the board. FiftyPlusOne's is dated October 26. Every poll published in between, including New York Times/Siena surveys of Alaska and Ohio fielded through October 1 and YouGov's Kansas survey fielded through October 4, may be in one and not the other.
  • A third model sits with FiftyPlusOne. Silver Bulletin's Deluxe forecast, read once on October 4 from its subscriber page and not a board source, has control at 72.8% and publishes projected margins, so its markdown can be read directly: it adds 0.8 points to its own poll average in Maine and takes 2.1 off in Kansas and 0.4 off in Ohio, nearer FiftyPlusOne's inferred markdowns than DDHQ's in all three. Its Classic version, without expert ratings, has control at 70.0% and differs by 0.2 to 0.7 points in those seats, so expert ratings, which FiftyPlusOne also uses, are worth 2.8 points of control inside Silver Bulletin's model, against a gap of 18. Agreement between two models identifies DDHQ as the one that differs and leaves open which is closer to the result.
Opened Oct 2, 2026 · U.S. Senate control · Maine Senate · Kansas Senate · Ohio Senate (special)
10
points apart

In states Trump carried, the sources take anywhere from 0 to 6 points off the Democratic poll lead

Unclassified

Most of the seat-level disagreement is how far to mark down the Democrat's poll margin in a Republican state. In South Carolina Kalshi rose from 20% to 24% since October 25 and now takes 2.5 points off, against FiftyPlusOne's 0.5 at 34.2%. In Ohio FiftyPlusOne fell to 62.7% and takes off 1.7, Kalshi 0.9 at 67.5% and DDHQ 3.6 at 51%.

Kalshi, South Carolina 24%DDHQ, South Carolina 28%50+1, South Carolina 34%Kalshi, Ohio 68%DDHQ, Ohio 51%50+1, Ohio 63%Kalshi, Alaska 75%DDHQ, Alaska 60%50+1, Alaska 66%
Leans toward the market

A markdown of 2 to 5 points is what the record supports, and the market's sits in that band in South Carolina, Ohio, Kansas and Iowa while FiftyPlusOne's sits under it in all four. The exception is Texas, where the market prices the poll lead nearly at face value; there DDHQ's 1.8-point markdown is closer to the record.

Why these should match, and what could explain the gap

Every source reads the same polls. Turning each probability back into a margin shows what it does to them. The market takes 2.5 points off the Democrat in South Carolina and Kansas, 1.3 in Iowa and 0.9 in Ohio, adds 0.1 in Texas, and adds 1.7 to Peltola's lead in Alaska, where its price is 74.5% against a poll average of Peltola +2.6. DDHQ takes off 5.6 in Kansas, 3.6 in Ohio, 1.7 in South Carolina, 1.3 in Texas and 1 in Alaska, and adds 0.4 in Iowa. FiftyPlusOne takes off 1.7 in Ohio, 1 in Kansas, 0.9 in Texas and 0.5 in South Carolina, and adds 0.3 in Iowa and 0.1 in Alaska. South Carolina moved most: Kalshi went from 20.5% on October 24 and 20% on October 25 to 24% today, with the poll average unchanged at Graham +2.1, so its markdown went from 3.3 points to 2.5. FiftyPlusOne's October 26 reading has Ohio at 62.7% from 64.5% and Kansas at 48.7% from 51.2%, against poll averages of Brown +3.8 and Hamilton +0.8. Kalshi is at 67.5% in Ohio, 64.5% in Texas (poll average Talarico +2.3) and 41.5% in Iowa (Hinson +0.1). Against the 2-to-5-point band in the record, the market sits inside it in South Carolina and Kansas and under it in Iowa, Ohio and Texas; the October 3 call rested on four seats inside the band and today there are two. DDHQ sits inside it in Ohio, under it in South Carolina, Texas and Iowa and above it in Kansas; FiftyPlusOne sits under it in all six. DDHQ's numbers are dated October 2.

  • The record: Republican-state Senate polls overstated the Democrat in 17 of 19 midterm races since 2014, by 5.3 points on average, and by 2 to 3 points in the contested races of 2018 and 2022.
  • Base rates: out-party challengers have beaten an incumbent of the president's party in a state this red in 2 of 37 midterm races since 2006; open seats went 2 of 8.
  • Alaska has votes behind its premium: Peltola out-polled Sullivan by 8 in the August primary, and the newest poll (New York Times/Siena, September 24 to October 1) has her up 50 to 43. Its Senate polls missed the other way in 2020, understating Sullivan's margin by about 8 points. Texas has only polls, and its final averages overstated the Democrat by 3 to 4.5 in the last two cycles.
  • A third model, read once. Silver Bulletin's Deluxe forecast (October 4, subscriber page, not a board source) publishes projected margins, so its markdown can be read directly: 2.7 points off its own poll average in South Carolina and 2.1 in Kansas, inside the 2-to-5-point band; 0.4 off in Ohio, nothing in Iowa and 0.3 added in Texas, under it. Its South Carolina number is 19.8%, nearer the market's 14.5% than FiftyPlusOne's 36.1% that day. In Alaska it has Peltola at 62.9% on a 3.1-point first-choice lead, between the other two models and 11 points under the market; two other Republicans hold 4.2 points of first-choice vote in its projection, which under ranked-choice counting may be why the lead converts to a lower probability there than in any other tracked seat.
Opened Oct 2, 2026 · South Carolina Senate · Ohio Senate (special) · Iowa Senate · Kansas Senate · Texas Senate · Alaska Senate
10
points apart

Nebraska: every source prices Osborn further behind than the polls have him

Unclassified

Closed October 8: the spread between sources was 9.5 points on the October 7 and 8 boards, from 10.9 on October 5, as FiftyPlusOne rose from 17.6% to 19.1% and Kalshi fell from 28.5% to 27.5%; DDHQ is at 18%. The split in markdown remains: against a poll average of Ricketts +0.9, the market takes 3 points off Osborn, the models 5 and 4.8, against his 5.1-point miss in 2024.

Kalshi 28%50+1 19%DDHQ 18%
Leans toward the models

The one measured miss for this candidate in this state is 5.1 points (2024). With the poll average at Ricketts +1.0, the models' markdowns of 4.9 and 5.1 match it and the market's 2.7 falls short. The October 3 lean went to the market, whose 5-point markdown then matched the miss against an average of Osborn +1.1; the averages updated October 2 to 4 moved the comparison, not the prices.

Why these should match, and what could explain the gap

The two models agree with each other to within 1.2 points, which usually marks a number the market also accepts. Here the market was 10.5 to 10.9 points above them on October 5 and 6, and is 9.5 and 8.4 above them now. All three mark Osborn's polling down: the market by 3 points, DDHQ by 5 and FiftyPlusOne by 4.8, against 5, 7 and 6.8 on October 2. The poll average moved from Osborn +1.1 on October 2 to Ricketts +1.0 on October 5 and Ricketts +0.9 now, after FiftyPlusOne's average moved from Ricketts +0.9 to +0.4 on October 6; 270toWin (October 2) has Ricketts +1.6 and Silver Bulletin (October 4) +0.6. The newest poll in the table, YouGov, fielded September 24 to October 3, has Osborn 48, Ricketts 47. Silver Bulletin's forecast, read once on October 4 and not a board source, takes 3.7 off its own average and has Osborn at 24.7%, between the market and the models.

  • In 2024 the final average had Osborn 1.6 behind and he lost by 6.7, a 5.1-point miss.
  • The contract may also carry the value of a 50-49-1 Senate, where Osborn would decide who organizes the chamber.
  • Trump carried Nebraska by 20.6. The only out-party challenger to win a midterm Senate race in a state that red since 2006 was Jon Tester in Montana that year.
Opened Oct 2, 2026 · Nebraska Senate
2
points apart

Kalshi's control price sits between its own seat prices and its seat-count market

Unclassified

Kalshi's control contract rose a point to 63.5% and its seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, fell to 64.8%: 1.3 points over control, from 3.8 on October 25. The thirteen seat contracts imply 60.5% to 61.7%, 1.8 points under control and under 2 for a second board. The entry closes if the seat-count leg stays under 2 on the next board.

Control contract 64%Seat-count market, 51 or more 65%Implied by 13 seat prices 61%
Why these should match, and what could explain the gap

All three numbers price the same event, a Democratic majority. The seat contracts are combined at the correlation Kalshi's own four-seat joint contract implies, 0.84, from 0.88; that contract was 56.5% on October 25 and 53.5% today. Across 0.69 to 0.95 the seats give 60.5% to 61.7%, with 51.1 expected Democratic seats. Since October 25 control rose from 62.5% to 63.5% while the seats fell slightly: Michigan 3 points to 65.5%, Georgia 1 to 94.65% and Maine 1 to 59.5%, against South Carolina up 4 to 24% and Florida and Nebraska up 2 each to 12.5% and 26.5%. The seat-count market went from 66.4% to 64.8%, so the two Kalshi markets that price the chamber directly moved toward each other after moving apart on October 25. It was 2 to 4.8 points above control from October 4 to 11, 2.1 on October 17, 2.4 and 2.2 on October 22 and 23, 0.4 on October 24 and 3.8 on October 25. The entry closes when both legs are under 2 points on two consecutive boards.

  • Seats outside the count: independents in Montana and Idaho, and Osborn in Nebraska at 26.5%. Any of them caucusing with Democrats adds a seat the thirteen contracts do not carry.
  • Settlement rule: the control contract pays on the party of the President pro tempore, so a 50-49-1 Senate organized with Osborn's vote would resolve for Democrats without a 51st seat.
  • Quoting and flow: the seat-count figure is summed from the midpoints of several bucket contracts, normalized to sum to 1, so wide quotes in the buckets can move it by points with no trade; the control contract is the headline market and may move on attention alone.
Opened Oct 2, 2026 · U.S. Senate control · Nebraska Senate

Senate control over time

Latest: Kalshi 64%; DDHQ 54%, 50+1 72%.

Daily closing price for Democratic control on each venue. Model readings are recorded from October 2 and are not drawn until there is a series to draw.

KalshiPolymarket
0%25%50%75%100%Dec 24Apr 25Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Aug 2665%64%

What moves many seats at once

Three variables sit behind most of the numbers above. A change in any of them moves several seats together, which is why the seats cannot be read one at a time.

National environment

moderate uncertainty

The generic-ballot margin moves every seat at once. Six of the tracked Republican-held seats are in states Trump carried by 11 to 18 points in 2024, so a Democratic majority depends on the environment holding at a level that makes those states competitive. House control pricing is tracked here as a reading on the same variable.

Correlated polling error

high uncertainty

Seat probabilities are not independent. A polling miss in one red state is likely to repeat in the others, which widens the range of seat totals without changing any single seat's odds. How strongly the seats move together is the main thing separating a narrow majority from a large one, and sources that agree seat by seat can still disagree on control because they assume different amounts of it.

Chamber organization

moderate uncertainty

With a Republican vice president, 50 Democratic seats is not control. Dan Osborn has said he would caucus with neither party, so a 50-49-1 Senate would be decided by how he votes on organizing the chamber. The two venues' control contracts resolve this case differently.

Key dates

Oct 15, 2026FEC third-quarter reports due
Oct 22, 2026FEC pre-general reports due
Nov 3, 2026General election
Dec 1, 2026Georgia runoff, if no candidate reaches a majority
Jan 3, 2027120th Congress convenes
Feb 1, 2027Kalshi control contract settles

Log

Editorial updates, newest first.

Oct 26, 2026update

Kalshi and Polymarket back within a point on control; Kalshi's South Carolina price up 4 to 24%

The two chamber gaps that opened on October 25 narrowed. Kalshi's control contract rose a point to 63.5% and Polymarket fell 2 to 64.5%, a 1-point gap, from 4. Kalshi's seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, fell from 66.4% to 64.8%, now 1.3 points over control, from 3.8. Its thirteen seat contracts imply 60.5% to 61.7%, 1.8 points under control. In the seats, Kalshi's South Carolina price went from 20% to 24% with the poll average unchanged at Graham +2.1, so the market now takes 2.5 points off the Democrat there, from 3.3 on October 24. FiftyPlusOne's October 26 reading lowered Ohio from 64.5% to 62.7%, Kansas from 51.2% to 48.7% and control from 73.5% to 72.4%; the spread between the two models on control is 18.4 points, from 19.5. Kalshi's Michigan price fell 3 points to 65.5%. All four open entries were revised to today's board; none was opened or closed. The venue entry closes if the gap stays under 2 points on the next board, and the seat-count entry if its seat-count leg does. DDHQ's reading is still dated October 2; no newer one has been recorded since October 5.

Oct 25, 2026update

Kalshi's control price fell 3 points to 62.5%, now 4 under Polymarket and 3.8 under its own seat-count market

Kalshi's control contract went from 65.5% to 62.5% since October 24. Polymarket fell 1 point to 66.5%, so the two venues are 4 points apart on the same question, the widest gap on any board since October 2. Kalshi's seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, rose from 65.9% to 66.4% and now sits 3.8 points over control, from 0.4. The thirteen Kalshi seat contracts fell less than control: Maine 3 points to 60.5%, Minnesota 2 to 83.5%, Ohio 1 to 67.5%, with Texas and Nebraska up 1 each. Together they imply 61.1% to 62.6%, a range that now contains control, after a 2.1-point gap on October 24. The models are unchanged: 54% for DDHQ, 73.5% for FiftyPlusOne. A venue entry was opened on the Kalshi-Polymarket gap; an earlier one on the same question closed October 15. The seat-count and model-spread entries were revised to today's board. The seat-count entry stays open and closes when both legs are under 2 points on two consecutive boards. DDHQ's reading is still dated October 2; no newer one has been recorded since October 5.

Oct 24, 2026update

Kalshi's seat prices fell further than its control price; control now sits 2.1 points above them

Since October 22 Kalshi's seat contracts fell: Texas 4 points to 63.5%, Ohio, Maine and Minnesota 2 each to 68.5%, 63.5% and 85.5%, with South Carolina up 1.5 to 20.5%. Together they now imply 61.9% to 63.4% for a Democratic majority. The control contract went from 66.5% to 67.5% on October 23 and 65.5% today, so it sits 2.1 points over its parts, after 4.5 on October 23. The seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, fell from 68.9% to 65.9%, 0.4 points over control, from 2.4 on October 22 and 2.2 on October 23. In Ohio and Texas the market again marks the Democrat's poll lead down, by 0.8 points on a Brown +3.9 average and 0.1 on Talarico +2.3, where on October 22 it added to both. The models are 19.5 points apart on control, 54% against 73.5%, from 21.1. The seat-count, model-spread and red-state entries were revised to today's board. The seat-count entry stays open on both legs and closes when both are under 2 points on two consecutive boards. No entry was opened or closed. DDHQ's reading is still dated October 2; no newer one has been recorded since October 5.

Oct 22, 2026update

Kalshi's control price rose 4 points to 66.5%; its seat-count market is now 2.4 points above it

Kalshi's control contract rose from 62.5% on October 19 to 66.5%, and Polymarket's from 64.5% to 68.5%. The seat contracts rose with it: Texas 6 points to 67.5%, Ohio 5 to 70.5%, Maine 5 to 65.5%, with Iowa down 2 to 41.5%. Together they now imply 63.6% to 65.6% for a Democratic majority, so control sits 0.9 points over its parts, under 2 on all four boards since October 19. The seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, is 68.9%, 2.4 points over control. In Ohio and Texas the market now adds to the Democrat's poll lead rather than marking it down: 0.3 points on a Brown +3.2 average and 0.6 on Talarico +2.3. DDHQ's model takes 3 and 1.3 off, FiftyPlusOne 0.6 and 0.8. In South Carolina the market still takes 3.9 points off, against FiftyPlusOne's 0.3. The models remain 21.1 points apart on control, 54% against 75.1%. The seat-count, model-spread and red-state entries were revised to today's board. The seat-count entry stays open on the seat-count leg and closes if that gap is under 2 points on two consecutive boards. No entry was opened or closed. DDHQ's reading is still dated October 2; the daily reader has failed to load its page every day since October 5.

Oct 19, 2026update

Kalshi's control price is 1.9 points over its seat contracts, the first board under 2 since October 10

Kalshi's thirteen seat contracts now imply a 60.3% to 60.6% chance of a Democratic majority, from 59.5% to 59.7%, as Kansas and Maine rose 2 points each and South Carolina and Michigan 1. The control contract held at 62.5%, so it sits 1.9 points over its parts, from 2.8. The seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, rose from 62.3% to 63.4% and is 0.9 points over control. Kansas is 28.8 points apart across sources: FiftyPlusOne 51.8%, Kalshi 38.5% and DDHQ 23%. In Ohio the five-aggregator poll average fell from Brown +3.5 to +3.1 as Decision Desk HQ's polling average moved from Brown +3.0 to +1.5, and the newest poll, ActiVote, has the race tied at 50; Kalshi is unchanged at 65.5%, so its markdown of Brown's lead fell to 0.5 points. In South Carolina Kalshi rose from 16.5% to 17.5% and takes 4.3 points off the Democrat, against FiftyPlusOne's 0.8. The seat-count, model-spread and red-state entries were revised to today's board. The seat-count entry stays open and closes if the gap to the seat contracts is still under 2 points on the next board. No entry was opened. DDHQ's reading is still dated October 2.

Oct 18, 2026update

Kalshi's seat-count market is back within 0.2 points of its control price; FiftyPlusOne has Kansas at 51.4%

Kalshi's seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, rose from 60.4% to 62.3%, against a control contract unchanged at 62.5%. The gap between them fell from 2.1 points to 0.2, so October 17 is the only board since October 12 on which they were more than 2 points apart. The thirteen seat contracts imply 59.5% to 59.7%, and control sits 2.8 points over its parts, over 2 on every board since October 11. FiftyPlusOne's Kansas number is 51.4%, from 46.4% on October 15, against DDHQ's 23% and Kalshi's 36.5%, so Kansas is 28.4 points apart across sources. Against a five-aggregator poll average of Hamilton +0.7, FiftyPlusOne takes 0.5 points off his lead, Kalshi 2.9 and DDHQ 5.5. FiftyPlusOne's control number is 74.9%, from 73.4% on October 15, and the models are 20.9 points apart; Kalshi is at 62.5% and Polymarket at 64.5%. The seat-count and model-spread entries were revised to today's board; the seat-count entry stays open on the gap to the seat contracts. No entry was opened or closed. DDHQ's reading is still dated October 2.

Oct 17, 2026update

Kalshi's seat-count market slipped 2.1 points under its control price; Ohio rose 5 points with the polls unchanged

Kalshi's seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, fell from 61.5% on October 15 to 60.4%, while the control contract rose from 61.5% to 62.5%. That puts the seat-count market 2.1 points under control, the first board on which it sits more than 2 points below it; it had been within 2 points on the five boards from October 12 to 16. The thirteen seat contracts imply 59% to 59.6%, so control sits 2.9 points over its parts, over 2 on every board since October 11. Kalshi's Ohio price rose from 59.5% to 62.5% on October 16 and 64.5% today, while the five-aggregator poll average moved from Brown +3.4 to +3.5. Against that average the market's markdown of Brown's lead fell from 1.8 to 1.1 points, against DDHQ's 3.3 and FiftyPlusOne's 0.9. South Carolina's spread narrowed from 21 to 19.6 points as Kalshi rose from 14.5% to 15.5%. The seat-count and red-state entries were revised to today's board. The model-spread entry is unchanged: Kansas is 25.1 points apart and Maine 18.3, from 23.4 and 16.7, and the models are 19.2 points apart on control. No entry was opened. DDHQ's reading is still dated October 2.

Oct 15, 2026update

Kansas is 23.4 points apart across sources; Kalshi's seat-count market now matches its control price

FiftyPlusOne's Kansas number rose from 42.5% on October 12 to 46.4%, against DDHQ's 23% and Kalshi's 36.5%, so the spread there widened from 19.5 to 23.4 points. Its control number rose from 71.4% to 73.4%, and the models are 19.4 points apart; FiftyPlusOne now runs 2 points or more above DDHQ in ten of the fourteen seats, Nebraska added. Kalshi (61.5%) and Polymarket (63.5%) are unchanged since October 12. Kalshi's seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, fell from 62.7% to 61.5% and now matches the control contract, after four boards within 2 points of it. The thirteen seat contracts imply 58.1% to 58.5%, so control sits 3 points over its parts, from 2.4, as the correlation implied by the four-seat joint contract eased from 0.78 to 0.72. The gap between venues has been 2 points on four boards. The model-spread and seat-count entries were revised to today's board; the seat-count entry stays open on the control gap. The venue entry is closed. No entry was opened. The Kansas poll average on today's board rests on one aggregator, RealClearPolitics, against five on October 12, so Kansas markdowns are read against the October 12 average. DDHQ's reading is still dated October 2.

Oct 12, 2026update

Kalshi’s seat-count market back within 1.2 points of its control price; Kalshi and Polymarket 2 points apart

Kalshi’s control contract rose from 60.5% to 61.5% after three boards unchanged, and its seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, eased from 64.1% to 62.7%. The gap between the two narrowed from 3.6 to 1.2 points, the least since October 5. Polymarket held at 63.5%, so the gap between venues narrowed from 3 points to 2. Kalshi’s thirteen seat contracts now imply 58.5% to 59.1%, from 58.2%, as the correlation implied by its four-seat joint contract rose from 0.71 to 0.78 with that contract at 51.5%, from 49.5%. The control contract sits 2.4 points over its parts, from 2.2. No seat price or model reading moved 2 points or more. FiftyPlusOne’s control number is 71.4%, from 72%, and the models are 17.4 points apart. The seat-count entry was revised to today’s board and stays open; the seat-count gap closes if it stays under 2 on the next board. No entry was opened or closed. DDHQ’s reading is still dated October 2.

Oct 11, 2026update

Kalshi and Polymarket 3 points apart on Senate control; Kalshi’s control price back over its seat contracts by 2.2

Kalshi’s control contract held at 60.5% for a third board while Polymarket rose from 62.5% on October 9 to 63.5%, a 3-point gap on the same question and the widest of the ten boards since October 2; Kalshi has been at or below Polymarket on all of them. A new entry records the gap without a call. Kalshi’s thirteen seat contracts now imply 58.2%, from 59.1% on October 9, so the control contract is 2.2 points over its parts after two boards under 2. The correlation implied by its four-seat joint contract rose from 0.55 to 0.71 as that contract moved from 46.5% to 49.5%. The seat-count market eased to 64.1%, 3.6 points over control, from 4.8. Kalshi’s Ohio price fell 2 points to 59.5%, so the market takes 1.8 points off Brown’s 3.4-point poll lead. In Alaska the poll average narrowed from Peltola +2.9 to +2.35 with Kalshi unchanged at 73.5%, so the market now adds 1.7 to it. FiftyPlusOne’s control number is 72%, from 73.3%, and the models are 18 points apart. The seat-count and Republican-state markdown entries were revised to today’s board; their leans are unchanged. No entry was closed. DDHQ’s reading is still dated October 2.

Oct 9, 2026update

Kalshi's control price fell to 60.5%, 1.3 points over its seat contracts, the first board under 2

Kalshi's control contract is at 60.5%, from 62.5% on October 8 and 63.5% on October 7, the lowest of the eight boards since October 2; Polymarket is at 62.5%. The thirteen seat contracts imply 59.1%, so control sits 1.3 points over its parts, the first board under 2 points since the entry opened. The seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, is at 65.3%, 4.8 points over the control contract, after 3.5 on October 8. The correlation implied by Kalshi's four-seat joint contract fell from 0.63 to 0.55 as that contract moved from 48.5% to 46.5%. Kalshi's Alaska price fell from 75.5% to 73.5%, its October 5 level, and the market now adds 1.2 points to Peltola's poll lead of 2.9. In Iowa, FiftyPlusOne is at 52.6%, 0.6 points over DDHQ, so FiftyPlusOne is now 2 points or more above DDHQ in nine of the thirteen seats, from ten. The models are 19.3 points apart on control (DDHQ 54%, FiftyPlusOne 73.3%). Michigan's Kalshi price fell 4 points since October 7, to 67.5%, against 71% from both models. The seat-count, model-spread and Republican-state markdown entries were revised to today's board; their leans are unchanged. No entry was opened or closed. DDHQ's page refused the daily reader with a rate-limit error for a fifth day, so its reading is still dated October 2.

Oct 8, 2026update

Nebraska's spread stayed under 10 points for a second board, and its entry is closed

Nebraska's sources are 9.5 points apart on the October 7 and 8 boards, from 10.9 on October 5: FiftyPlusOne has Osborn at 19.1%, from 17.6%, Kalshi at 27.5%, from 28.5%, and DDHQ at 18%. The entry is closed. The split it recorded remains: against a poll average of Ricketts +0.9, the market takes 3 points off Osborn and the models 5 and 4.8, against his 5.1-point miss in 2024. Elsewhere the board moved by under 2 points. The models are 19.4 points apart on control (DDHQ 54%, FiftyPlusOne 73.4%), with Kalshi at 62.5% and Polymarket at 63.5%. Kalshi's seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, fell to 66% after five days of gains, 3.5 points over the control contract; the thirteen seat contracts imply 60.2%. Iowa's spread fell to 8.6 points as FiftyPlusOne moved from 55.3% to 53.1%. DDHQ's reading is still dated October 2. The other entries were not revised and no entry was opened; North Carolina (14.9), Florida (13.9) and Georgia (10) are past 10 points but are settled seats.

Oct 7, 2026update

Kansas is 20 points apart across sources, and Kalshi's seat count runs 4.3 points over its control price

Kansas is 20 points apart, from 15 on October 5. FiftyPlusOne has Hamilton at 43%, from 38.4% on October 6, and Kalshi at 36.5%, from 34.5% on October 5; DDHQ is still at 23%. A YouGov poll fielded September 24 to October 4 (Hamilton 48, Marshall 45) is now in the Kansas table, and the poll average is Hamilton +0.5, from +0.15. DDHQ takes 5.3 points off Hamilton's polling, the market 2.7 and FiftyPlusOne 1.6. The two models are 20 points apart on control (DDHQ 54%, FiftyPlusOne 74%), from 17.5. FiftyPlusOne is now 2 points or more above DDHQ in ten of the thirteen seats, Iowa added. DDHQ's number is still its October 2 reading: its page has refused the daily reader with a rate-limit error on October 5, 6 and 7, so whether DDHQ has published a newer one is not known. Kalshi is at 63.5% and Polymarket at 64.5%. Kalshi's seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, rose for a fifth straight day to 67.8%, 4.3 points over the control contract (63.5%); the thirteen seat contracts imply 60.8%. In Alaska since October 5, Kalshi rose 3 points to 76.5% and FiftyPlusOne 3.7 to 69.4% with the poll average unchanged at Peltola +2.9, so the market now adds 1.8 points to her lead. FiftyPlusOne's markdown is under 2 points in all six Republican states the markdown entry tracks, Kansas included. The model-spread, Republican-state markdown and seat-count entries were revised; the leans in the markdown and Nebraska entries are unchanged. Nebraska's spread fell to 9.5 points, its first board under 10 since October 3, and its entry stays open until a second board confirms. North Carolina (14.9) and Florida (13.5) are past 10 points but are settled seats. No entry was opened or closed.

Oct 5, 2026update

Nebraska's poll average turns to Ricketts +1.0, and the lean there moves to the models

Nebraska's poll average moved from Osborn +1.1 on October 2 to Ricketts +1.0. 270toWin, FiftyPlusOne and Silver Bulletin updated their averages between October 2 and 4, each now with Ricketts ahead by 0.6 to 1.6, and Decision Desk HQ's September 27 average (Osborn +3.1) left the table. Prices moved by under 2 points over the same days, so the markdowns shrank: the market now takes 2.7 points off Osborn's polling (28.5%), DDHQ 4.9 and FiftyPlusOne 5.1 (18% each). The one measured miss for Osborn, 5.1 points in 2024, now matches the models' markdown, so the October 3 lean toward the market was moved to the models. The spread is 10.9 points. Kalshi's control contract rose 2 points to 64.5%, 1.2 under its seat-count market (65.7%); the two were 3 points apart on October 4. Its thirteen seat contracts still imply 59.3% to 60.9%, so control sits 3.6 points above its parts. The coherence entry was revised. The model spread on control is 17.5 points (DDHQ 54%, FiftyPlusOne 71.5%). Kalshi's Maine price fell 3 points to 55.5%, and Maine is now 17 points apart between the two models. DDHQ's number is still its October 2 reading. The model-spread entry was revised; the Republican-state markdown entry is unchanged. No entry was opened or closed.

Oct 5, 2026update

Silver Bulletin read once: 72.8% on control, beside FiftyPlusOne and 19 points above DDHQ

Silver Bulletin's Deluxe forecast, read once on October 4 from its subscriber page, has Democratic control of the Senate at 72.8% with an average of 52 seats. FiftyPlusOne is at 71.6% and DDHQ at 54%, so DDHQ is the low reading of three. Kalshi (62.5%) and Polymarket (64.5%) are 7 to 10 points under the two higher models. The reading is cited in the model-spread and Republican-state markdown entries and is not a board source: the board carries only sources that can be read daily from public pages. Silver Bulletin publishes projected margins beside its poll averages. In Ohio, Texas, Iowa and Maine its projection is within a point of its own poll average, and it has the Democrat at 74% in Ohio and Texas, the highest of any source in both. In Kansas, Nebraska and South Carolina it takes 2 to 4 points off the non-Republican's poll margin. Its Classic version, without expert ratings, has control at 70.0% and moves the six focus seats by under a point, so the ratings are worth 2.8 points of control in its model, against 18 between DDHQ and FiftyPlusOne. No lean was added: two models agreeing is not a measured result. Seat by seat, beyond Ohio and Texas it is also the highest source in Iowa (58.9%), Kansas (41.6%) and Michigan (81.8%, about 10 points above the other three). In South Carolina (19.8%) and Florida (13.7%) it is nearer the market than DDHQ and FiftyPlusOne are. In Alaska it has Peltola at 62.9%, beside the other two models and 10 points under Kalshi's 73%. Its control number sits inside the range its own seat numbers imply.

Oct 4, 2026update

Alaska spread widens to 13 points; Kalshi's seat-count and control prices split by 3

Alaska's spread between sources widened from 7.5 points on October 2 to 13. Kalshi rose from 67.5% to 73% and FiftyPlusOne from 61.5% to 65.5%; DDHQ's 60% is still its October 2 reading. The newest poll, New York Times/Siena (September 24 to October 1), has Peltola ahead 50 to 43, and the poll average moved from 2.0 to 2.9. The gap is recorded in the existing entry on Republican-state markdowns, where the market now adds 1.1 points to Peltola's lead. Kalshi's seat-count market, summed at 51 seats and above, rose to 65.5% while its control contract fell back to 62.5%, a 3-point gap on the first board where it exceeded 2. The thirteen seat prices imply 60%. The coherence entry now carries all three numbers. Ohio's poll average narrowed from 4.5 to 3.3, which cut the market's implied markdown there from 2.8 to 1.2 points, under the 2-to-5-point band behind the October 3 lean on Republican-state markdowns. That lean is unchanged, since the record it rests on has not changed. The model-spread entry was revised to 18 points (DDHQ 54%, FiftyPlusOne 72%) and now names Kansas alongside Maine and Ohio. No entry was opened or closed.